terça-feira, 24 de maio de 2011

arnold schwarzenegger photos

arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • 2 Replies
    Apr 14, 03:01 PM
    Being a non-jetsetting 3gs user, this isn't really worth it for me. Maybe I'll get it sometime, but no rush here. :-p

    But seeing that it "Contains the latest security updates"...
    It would really be nice if small patches and updates like that were distributed through the iOS app store.
    OTA updates would be a GOOD thing.
    (Especially since Apple store employees are known for insisting iPhone users and iPad users don't necessarily NEED a computer. :-/ )




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. arnold-schwarzenegger--286.jpg
  • arnold-schwarzenegger--286.jpg


  • Stridder44
    Mar 31, 11:38 AM
    I love these new UI touches.

    But UI changes are not enough for me to spend $129 on alone. If it were $29 like Snow Leopard was, then that'd be different, but I highly doubt that'll happen this time around. Let's see some real features (ones that haven't been mentioned yet).




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • (marc)
    Apr 24, 02:21 PM
    Surgery isn't a magic wand.

    Some transgender people "pass" better than others. It's not just transgender people who have their gender challenged either, it happens plenty to anyone that appears gender ambiguous.

    Bullies latch onto any and all perceived insecurity and take advantage of it, in this case it had profoundly unpleasant consequences.

    Why are you trying to turn the assault into bullying / an LGBT hate crime? I know MacRumors PRSI is obsessed with the issue, but there's no evidence for it.




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. arnold schwarzenegger
  • arnold schwarzenegger


  • IJ Reilly
    Jan 27, 11:35 AM
    True, that's why I like to look at the PEG Ratio (P/E to Growth). If we take the current price of 130 minus cash net of payables and receivables (approx $17 a share), you get 113 for the "enterprise" value of Apple. I'll give it a conservative $5/share earnings this year, for a P/E of 23. According to Yahoo, we have an estimate of 30% growth this year, so we are getting a PEG of less than 1 for this year. Less than 1 is cheap, HOWEVER, it doesn't mean it can't/won't get cheaper.

    Excellent comments. Long-time AAPL investors have seen these moments of despair before -- too many times before, to be honest. The markets have always treated Apple this way, unfortunately. It's difficult to imagine Apple's prospects being any brighter. The company is moving forward on all fronts. These are times when you have look down the road instead of at the potholes at your feet.



    more...

    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • AdeFowler
    Apr 29, 04:13 PM
    The artists must be thrilled :rolleyes:




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger - Photos
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger - Photos


  • Mherm88
    May 3, 08:21 AM
    Hopefully the ifixit teardown will reveal if there is a 2nd bay accessible for manually adding an SSD if I choose the 1TB option, I want to just put a 128GB or even a 64GB SSD just for applications and the system and store music/movies/photos/docs on the 1TB. I have my windows desktop setup this way with a 64GB and it is wonderful, I don't want to pay $600 to get a 256GB SSD plus 1TB.



    more...

    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger Abs
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger Abs


  • BornAgainMac
    Mar 31, 01:21 PM
    Microsoft Bob. No wait.... Apple Steve.




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • kiljoy616
    Mar 31, 03:54 PM
    I kind of like but does this also mean fragmentation again of the interface? :rolleyes:

    I rather have a consistant look an feel or if not then allowing for all Applications to have this which personally I rather not, give me boring but functional look.

    Ripped paper ROFL like I will think its real on a laptop or a 27 inch monitor.

    Make it clean Apple and functional leave all that play stuff for MS Windows.



    more...

    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • camomac
    Mar 2, 12:24 PM
    best quotes ever on being charlie sheen...

    http://www.comcast.net/slideshow/entertainment-sheenscrazyquotes/1/




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger poster
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger poster


  • tann
    Apr 22, 04:40 PM
    Maybe I'm just picky, but it looks like it might be TOO thin! Like I preferred the 3rd gen iPod touches because they seemed to be the best thickness, the 4th gen took it too far and having the volume and lock buttons on the curve felt weird and not as nice :/

    I'll still buy it though lol.



    more...

    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold definitely owns
  • Arnold definitely owns


  • killuminati
    Jul 25, 09:15 AM
    First of all, I think this should have been released at most a couple months after the introduction of the Mighty Mouse. Taking a year to give it BT capabilities is ridiculous.

    And $70 for a ****ing mouse is absurd. Doesn't look like I'll be buying anymore mice from apple.




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. arnold schwarzenegger now and
  • arnold schwarzenegger now and


  • bushido
    Apr 13, 04:21 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8G4)

    Anytime an "analyst" opens their mouth, it should be page 2 material at best.

    lol i agree, that term got the same value as a "source" on some gossip site



    more...

    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • Chupa Chupa
    May 4, 05:52 AM
    Disappointing, but expected. This actually brings up more questions than answers though:

    1) Is this a permanent move to a Fall Release of the iPhone?


    I'm starting to think it will be. If you look at the "big picture" it makes sense. The iPod is in decline, so Apple's previous big Fall music event isn't really big anymore. The iPhone could shore that up and bring lots of sales to 4Q and maybe even, reinvigorate iPod sales.

    Apple then uses early summer to push new Macs for back to school. Late winter/early Spring remains iPad.




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • AppleScruff1
    Apr 23, 06:50 PM
    It's obvious that at this point in time sales of any one phone model is going to be quite a bit less than iPhone sales. Model for model, nothing is close.



    more...

    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • mcmlxix
    Apr 13, 02:40 PM
    Only slightly off topic�

    Without using iTunes & ATV, does anyone know of a product where you can wirelessly stream the media contents of any shared volume to the TV? I would imagine such a product would need a PC/Mac side client as well as a TV attached gizmo�like iTunes & ATV. I have both anyway, but I was wondering of different options.




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • Lummi
    Apr 5, 11:43 AM
    I enjoy viewing these photo of the day threads almost daily. :)
    Rare contribution from me.

    http://i319.photobucket.com/albums/mm474/Lummi_2008/kmtalltrees.jpg



    more...

    arnold schwarzenegger photos. Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • GekkePrutser
    Apr 18, 04:06 AM
    Why are you guys expecting Apple to drop a USB port for the Thunderbolt?

    If Apple includes Thunderbolt it will be shared with the Mini DisplayPort. Just like on the MBP's. Which was already present on the MBA so I don't see the need to drop a USB port.

    I'm not sure if it will get one though due to the footprint of the new chip on the motherboard.




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. of Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • of Arnold Schwarzenegger


  • heehee
    Oct 21, 10:54 AM
    A trip to Mont Tremblant.




    arnold schwarzenegger photos. arnold schwarzenegger now fat
  • arnold schwarzenegger now fat


  • mattster16
    Sep 30, 09:47 AM
    It's interesting how cell service works. Here's a simplistic summary:

    Only a certain number of users can use a tower at any given time. There is only a certain range of frequencies that can be used. All towers use these same frequencies. This means that each tower must not overlap the others in terms of coverage area and frequenceis. To ensure this, companies actually use different frequency ranges on adjacent towers. Further limiting how many users can use each tower.

    The solution to this is to create smaller cell sites that cover a smaller area (and therefore will have fewer users at any given time). The problem with this is that each new cell site requires a new tower. With all the opposition to new tower construction it can take months or years to get approval to build one.

    With the massive growth in cell usage companies are having to create smaller and smaller cell sites. Because of the way the system works putting up one new tower requires the reconfiguration of all the adjacent towers. Their signal area must be changed, their frequencies must be changed and it all must be integrated together.

    When you get a dropped call, it's usually because you are moving into another cell site (serviced by a new tower). Your call must be handed off to the new tower. If this new tower is at capacity or overloaded, failures happen.

    This is why it sucks for very high density areas.

    Luckily in Minneapolis we have very good AT&T coverage. I get very fast 3G speeds and <1% dropped calls everywhere I go. Thank you urban sprawl for spreading everyone out.. When I was in NYC I noticed by data speeds were much slower. I didn't make enough calls to have any problems with that though.




    biggerbearbrian
    Oct 19, 09:03 AM
    *sigh* How many times do we have to refute your assertions with facts before you stop repeating them?

    To wit, the iPod is not Apple's "cash cow". By definition, if there is something that gains more revenue/profit than the iPod, then the iPod cannot be the cash cow. 58% of Apple's revenue still came from sales of Macs. Gross margins for both Macs and iPods has always been similar (hovering a bit below 30%), so the Mac also generates the majority of the profit for Apple.

    As for Apple's innovative spirit lacking when it comes to the Macs, let's just point out that it Apple updated the iPod in October 2005 to the 5th generation, and we JUST got the 5.5th generation last month. Apple took a year to add slightly brighter screens, better battery life (only for video), and games. The nano just gained the anodized aluminum exterior -- wow, Apple's reaching back to the past for it's innovation now! And the shuffle got slimmed down and consolidated into one product. All this doesn't sound exactly like innovation to me. (Of course, Apple doesn't really need to innovate, since they're already selling iPods by the boatload.)

    In contrast, Apple brought all of its Macs over to the Intel processor. The Mac Pro was dramatically higher value, what with double-wide graphics card slot, dual optical drives, 4 internal hard drive bays, etc., etc. All Macs (except for the Mac Pro) now have Front Row and a remote, which is a great feature. Built-in iSights have also migrated across the entire product line. The MacBook and MacBook Pro now have MagSafe -- a great innovation. Boot Camp is now supported on all new Macs. The Xserve has new features like lights-out management, redundant power supplies, etc. And we've seen some great things coming for Leopard, what with Time Machine and Spaces and iChat Theater and Core Animation and iCal Server, etc., etc., etc.

    It seems to me that Apple is innovating more on the Macintosh side of things than they are with the iPod. What are they going to add next on the iPod -- wireless? *gasp*, so innovative!

    Seriously, can we stop with this myth already? It's the same thing with all of Apple's "woes" with quality control (which was busted by the recent consumer reports articles where Apple has actually brought DOWN the number of new computers needing repair in their first year). It's something that's repeated ad nauseum by a few vocal people, when it's really not a problem at all. Same here: everybody gawks and writes about the iPod precisely because more people can afford it and more people can use it with whatever computer they have. So, obviously, you will hear more about the iPod.

    Let's see if repeating myself again has any effect: the iPod is not Apple's cash cow!

    Understood now?

    OK, now fire away :rolleyes:


    I think the argument can go either way. While iPod (which I love btw) is less than half Apple revenue ok. But if they were to just add the iPod line today, and have the amount of revenue they are reporting from it, the financial report would be "iPod has given us nearly a 100% increase in revenue".

    So get some hershey's syrup, cause we got milk.




    SiliconAddict
    Nov 4, 12:50 PM
    If it's taking you two minutes to resume a session and two minutes plus to suspend it, on that machine you mentioned the specs of, something is frickin' wrong with that machine.

    2.16 Core 2 Duo 20" iMac here, 2GB, stock 250GB drive, Parallels does the following:

    - it cold starts in 4 seconds
    - it boots my XP VM (512MB of RAM/8GB virtual hard disk) to the Desktop in 9
    - it suspended that same XP VM in 14
    - it restored that same XP VM in 11

    And that's with Crossover for Mac running several Windows apps in the background too, so some of my resources are already drained when I fired up Parallels and the VM. Memory usage at the moment for the entire machine is sitting at 1154MB of 2048MB, 69 tasks, 330 threads as measured by MenuMeters.

    So, give that box a tuneup or whatever, because you're certainly not getting the performance from Parallels that you should be getting. Also, check your VT-x flags under Parallels to make sure it's functioning properly.

    btw, this is Parallels build 1970, the latest and greatest, and I've had nothing but positive usage of Parallels since I bought it off the shelf in an Apple Store along with this iMac a month ago. 3 upgrades so far, no issues at all.

    bb

    I've reinstalled OS X twice in the last 9 months. The latest being about 3 weeks ago when I upgraded to a 160GB hard drive. There is nothing wrong with my computer. (OK there is something wrong with its sleeping mech but that has nothing to do with performance.)
    Parallels just sucks. Also I�m willing to bet the more you use the disk image and Windows the more parallels slows down. I�ve got a 14GB disk image, a ton of apps loaded, along with being in it every day for 8+ hours, USB peripherals all over the place, network settings for home and work, firewall enabled along with antivirus software. (I can�t use Office 2003 with SAP in OS X.) I probably use it more extensively then most Mac users. The simple fact is the reason why I keep reinstalling the demo instead of outright buying it is because I�m waiting on VMWare�s solution. VMWare is THE industry�s Microsoft when it comes to virtualizing. Just without the whole evilness thing. I�ve used Parallels extensively. I�m not impressed.




    Consultant
    Apr 14, 12:27 PM
    At this rate jailbreakers will never catch up.




    bushido
    Apr 12, 06:32 PM
    I heard the iphone 5 is delayed because the HTC Sensation has sent Apple back to the drawing board.

    lmao love it and so true + they need some time to spin the numbers in their favor for the keynote somehow




    daneoni
    May 1, 10:52 PM
    Am i the only who cannot access ANY video of the speech?



    Nenhum comentário:

    Postar um comentário